• SCALABLE
  • Posts
  • šŸŒŖļø Pivot Without Dying

šŸŒŖļø Pivot Without Dying

šŸ‘‰ The best pivots double down on what’s already working. Fewer users, fewer promises, clearer outcomes. I explain why that wins.

šŸ‘‹ Hey — Egemen here.

I listened to a 9 year old podcast this week and it’s still relevant today.

Most pivots fail for one boring reason: they change the story without changing the truth.

Founders sense momentum slowing down, then reach for the fastest-feeling lever: a new audience, a viral feature, a trend, a ā€œplatformā€ narrative, or a cheaper price.

Those moves are emotionally satisfying because they feel like action.
They are also the easiest ways to waste months.

Here’s a snapshot of what’s on the menu today:

šŸ’” Spotlight: Your competitors are already automating

🧠 Deep-Dive: Pivot Without Dying

šŸ—ŗļø Method: 2026 Talent Trends

āš¾ļø Catch: A Quick Survey

ā˜ļø Scaled This Past Week: Emergent

šŸ’” Spotlight

Your competitors are already automating. Here's the data.

Retail and ecommerce teams using AI for customer service are resolving 40-60% more tickets without more staff, cutting cost-per-ticket by 30%+, and handling seasonal spikes 3x faster.

But here's what separates winners from everyone else: they started with the data, not the hype.

Gladly handles the predictable volume, FAQs, routing, returns, order status, while your team focuses on customers who need a human touch. The result? Better experiences. Lower costs. Real competitive advantage. Ready to see what's possible for your business?

Presented by

🧠 Deep-Dive: Pivot Without Dying

I honestly don’t know why or how but I ended up going into VC dark web this week and ended up listening to a full podcast of a16z released in Feb 2017.

Jokes aside, a pivot that works is simpler and harder at the same time.

It is a deliberate decision to double down on what is already demonstrably working, then rebuild the company around that evidence.

Make no mistake, sometimes these things come as a last ditch effort for a story that’s about to end, but sometimes it’s vital.

So, here are two groups of pivots that you can go about:

  • The common pivots that look rational but usually backfire

  • The pivot types that tend to compound your existing strengths instead of resetting them

To avoid confusion, a pivot is not shipping more. It’s not ā€œa new feature.ā€
It is not ā€œbuilding a new AI layerā€ for the sake of it.

A real pivot changes at least one of these:

  1. Buyer: who pays

  2. User: who uses

  3. Problem: what job you solve

  4. Approach: how you solve it (workflow, distribution, architecture, model)

  5. Market frame: the category customers use to understand and buy it

ā

If you cannot clearly state what changed in one sentence, it is not a pivot. It is thrash.

me.

For example, I’ve never seen any of these pivots working within my ecosystem:

  • B2B → Consumer: Enterprise selling strengths, channels, and product expectations rarely translate to consumer distribution and habit-driven retention.

  • Adding chat/social/notifications: Engagement layers don’t create demand when the core product isn’t already essential.

  • Adding AI/Web3/whatever’s trending: Trend add-ons don’t materially change user outcomes, so novelty wears off and churn stays.

  • Paid → Free: Low willingness to pay usually signals weak perceived value, and free scales indifference faster than adoption.

šŸ‘‰ The best pivots are commitments: fewer users, fewer promises, fewer features, clearer outcomes.

That is what creates speed without chaos, and change without dying.

šŸ—ŗļø Method

AI in HR? It’s happening now.

Deel's free 2026 trends report cuts through all the hype and lays out what HR teams can really expect in 2026. You’ll learn about the shifts happening now, the skill gaps you can't ignore, and resilience strategies that aren't just buzzwords. Plus you’ll get a practical toolkit that helps you implement it all without another costly and time-consuming transformation project.

āš¾ļø Catch

Quick question about newsletter ads

We’re running a super short survey to see if our newsletter ads are being noticed. It takes about 20 seconds and there's just a few easy questions.

Your feedback helps us make smarter, better ads.

ā˜ļø Scaled This Past Week: Emergent

Emergent has raised $70 million in Series B at a roughly $300 million valuation – it’s the scale of the week!

Emergent builds an AI‑powered software creation platform that helps users design, test, and deploy mobile and web applications with minimal coding, empowering entrepreneurs and small businesses to ship digital products faster and with fewer technical barriers.

This funding will support scaling its engineering and research teams while expanding product capabilities and global reach as demand for AI‑driven development tools grows.

Do you like SCALABLE?

Reply

or to participate.